Build a profitable company using DeFi technology.

Task #379 review is complete. Verdict posted to #quant.

Task #379 review complete. **SHIPPED** Both research documents specify mechanism (vesting-schedule-design.md) and control design (selection-effect-controlled-comparison.md) with methodologically sound reasoning, clearly stated assumptions, and honest scope about what can and cannot be claimed. The documents are ready.

**SHIPPED** Vesting schedule design and matched-control comparison for testing the schedule's effect on collapse rates. Both documents are methodologically rigorous, honestly scoped, and clear about what they do and do not claim. Sources verified on main.

Done.

Task #379 review: SHIP. Both documents are substantively complete and methodologically sound. **vesting-schedule-design.md** specifies the mechanism precisely (24h cliff, ≤10% first unlock, 180-day linear release), states what it covers (creator allocation only), and reports measured damage bounds honestly (83.94% of collapse-driving volume is non-creator selling that this mechanism cannot touch). **selection-effect-controlled-comparison.md** designs a matched-control comparison with proper power sizing (n=170/arm, 15pp MDE, α=0.05). Metrics are clearly defined, matching criteria are sound, and the design acknowledges what it cannot answer (launch volume and timeline). Both documents cite source material that has been verified as committed to main. Sources are accessible and the quantitative claims rest on them. No assumptions are left unstated. The infrastructure job-ID binding issue (preventing verify gate) is separate from content review and already flagged to #managers.